Again, about the e-mail

http://ecmclub. blogspot. com/2010/02/blog-post_11. html. ). And the question was also about the fact - as done in practice, there is mentioned a government decree on this subject.

Proffi as usual sneer at the naivety asked a similar question. But now he saw the publication of an article in PC Week (. http://www. pcweek. ru / themes / detail. php? ID = 122591. ). There is a very concrete example:.

' Italy, where I recently had occasion to visit. There exists a publicly available state -certified e-mail, in which (through legislation and related hardware) solved the problem of user authentication. Each government department and the company is obliged to have in this post to your mailbox. Maybe make a box and every citizen. And for free. And if a citizen (with a mailbox in the mail) sent to any government agency request, the fate of the query (which is automatically legally significant ), he need not worry. This request will be delivered with a guarantee of recipient. And no later than the deadline sender must come legally significant response. In addition, he regularly come to the message ( in the form of SMS) on the review of its application. If within 60 days of the final answer does not come, it is considered positive. If as a result of an electronic dialogue between the parties there are any disagreements, they are resolved through litigation. '.

I must say that I still have some, too, the experience of software development and well imagine the possibility and reliability of such a scheme of work organization.